
For most, high dynamic range (HDR) images are most immediately applicable to landscape and still-life images, rather than photojournalistic event coverage. However, after shooting a number of shows with very high contrast lighting ratios, I thought I’d explore the possibilities of HDR processing as applied to concert photography.
While HDR merges are ideally achieved using multiple exposures for a given scene, the increasingly good latitude of digital files does present a convenient means for creating HDR images from a single RAW file.
The above five-image composite shows the same file with processing to merge a series of five “exposures” made from the same RAW file using the following settings for EV compensation:
- -1.3EV
- -1.0EV
- 0.0EV
- +1.0EV
- +1.5EV
The Scene:
This particular image was lit by relatively strong and neutral white light, which created a challenge for even exposure. Due to the very high contrast lighting, with just about zero fill and a very strong light source subject-left, the conventional options are to either meter for the subject’s primary focus (the face) and let everything else blow, preserve highlights at the expense of midtone and shadow detail, or to expose at a compromise and split the difference.
At the time of the shoot, I set my exposure just a little hot to ensure the midtones had plenty of detail and to curb rampant noise in the shadows. This point is most important given the push-processing of the RAW file, which brings up noise throughout the image, especially in the shadows and unclipped blacks. Since the original exposure runs hot, I was banking on the fact that I could pull back the highlights in RAW processing.
The original (0EV) image:

The approach:
My main goals for this image were to tame the blown highlights and also to open up the harsh shadows, thus expanding the perceived dynamic range of the scene. In other words, the end result is going to re-map a lot of what was originally either highlight or shadow into a wider swath of midtones in an effort to take the high contrast and otherwise open up the image.
Technique:
The final HDR composite was created using layer masks in Adobe Photoshop. After exporting the individual “exposures” from Nikon Capture NX, I copied pasted these images into a single file, separated into different layers, with the darkest exposure at the bottom.
Next, I went through the layers, top to bottom, and created rough tonal selection using Photoshop’s “color range” selection (Select > Color Range) and created layer masks to achieve the blend I wanted. The process is as follows:
- Color Range
- Feather (20 pixel radius)
- Layer Mask (hide selection)
This process was repeated all but the bottom, base layer. Below is the stack of five exposures and their respective tonal masks.

It’s important to note that in each successive layer, the mask decreases in size as the amount of highlights in the image grows smaller.
In the below composite, you can see the +1.5EV exposure on the left and the complimentary layer mask on the right. Here, the goal of the layer mask is to hide all highlight values so that the lower exposure below will be revealed. As the subsequent layers present less and less exposure, the tonal regions masked out

After tweaking these tonal selections, I also varied the opacity of the exposure layers to create a balance that looked right to my eye. Aside from creating the proper selections, changing the opacity of the layers is an important step in achieving a realistic gradation of tonal values, since these adjustments will directly affect the transitions between the blended exposure layers.
In an image like this with a large amount of black, the image may require masking of the shadows as well before finishing the image to prevent excessive shadow noise from being introduced by the most heavily pushed layers.
The HDR composite:

To me, this shot still has a little bit of a Frankenstein feel to it, but you can see how dramatically different this image is from the original with regard to tone and dynamic range.
End Notes:
While HDR effects for an entire set of images is not really a viable option, I think the flexibility shooting RAW presents some nice options for one-off images like the above. Despite the limited application for concert photography, I think this kind of editing can be a nice option for images intended for print or portfolio display.
With particular regard to the camera that created the above, I’ve been very impressed with the latitude the Nikon D3’s files posses, even at high ISO. From the files I’ve processed from the 1D Mark III, Canon’s flagship also displays a very, very nice level of flexibility for pushing and pulling in post. Both cameras certainly offer more options in this regard than the last generation, and while the wide latitude of negative film hasn’t yet been reached, I think we’re on our way.














10 Comments Add your own
1. olivier | March 18th, 2008 at 4:43 am
Simple question:
Did you ever try to do them in Photomatix ?
Olivier
2. Todd | March 18th, 2008 at 7:15 am
Oliver, I have not yet tried Photomatrix, though I’ve heard very good things about that app.
3. Chris | March 18th, 2008 at 7:18 am
Interesting post. I agree that the final image is still somewhat Frankenstein looking.
I’ve dabbled with this before, but honestly not since owning the 1D Mark III. The D200’s files at high ISO were simply not flexible enough to accomplish this. I can’t imagine what the D2X at even ISO 800 would be like.
4. Todd | March 18th, 2008 at 8:44 am
It’s an interesting situation. The D3 presents a noticeable increase in dynamic range from the D2x, and yet that same latitude allows for even more extreme processing of its RAW files.
It’s slightly counter-intuitive, as one might assume that an increase in DR would decrease the need for effects like this HDR composite, while in fact they facilitate the processing.
I did this a few times with the D2x, but those instances were almost always pulling the files to recover highlights.
I think this example is a bit extreme, featuring a nearly 3-stop push-pull range, though it does show what’s possible.
A more conventional use would be pulling back highlights on light-colored clothing and merging that with an original exposure.
5. Gavin Seim | March 19th, 2008 at 1:15 am
Cool, it’s good to see others working with this idea.
Your making it harder for yourself than is needed. I shoot weddings and portraits, and started experimenting with HDR and people last year, with some really good results.
By using a 3 shot 2ev auto bracket I can quickly grab three images, and cover a huge dynamic range. I then batch them out in photomatix, and finish in PS. I do this with nearly every shoot now. Theres a whole section on HDR portraits over on Pro Photo Show, and you can see lots of examples of it on my own site as well. It can be fit into a photographer workflow with the right tools.
Gavin Seim
6. Todd | March 19th, 2008 at 12:11 pm
Hey Gavin,
Thanks for your thoughts. I’d love to use actual exposure braketing for this type of shot, but it’s simply impossible given the amount of movement occurring on stage. In fact, the subject of this shot is headbanging
I should note that the severe contrasts for this shot are very extreme and this sort of processing isn’t necessary or desired for most shots.
But I have good things about Photomatix, I’ll have to give it a try. For concert shots and one-off blends, this manual tone-mapping is fast. For other applications, I’d like to see how accurate Photomatix is compared to Adobe’s auto-HDR feature (which failed for this shot).
7. Gavin Seim | March 19th, 2008 at 2:11 pm
Yes the movement does present a problem. HDR presents lots of challenges, but it neat because so few are using it for people portraits. I try to get people interested on PPS, but it’s an unknown region for most.
You should join us on the forums over on Pro Photo Show. I always like seeing an fellow HDR geek… Gav
8. Todd | March 20th, 2008 at 5:18 pm
Yup, most people are using HDR for landscapes and such, and I’ve seen some fantastic results for that.
I haven’t seen many photographers using it for portraits, let alone more event-styled shooting like concert and wedding. I’ll have a look over at the PPS forums, thanks for the invite. Cheers.
9. Giulio Sciorio | March 26th, 2008 at 1:41 am
Cool post and I dig the process however this is not true HDR. The process you’re writing about is called Tonal Editing. HDR imaging is from three or more separate RAW files (exposures ) and gives you much much more true dynamic range and a 32 bit file to render down to 16bit.
When printed properly the final HDR photograph is amazingly deep with detail while a Tonal Edited shot looks more cartoon like.
10. Todd | April 1st, 2008 at 10:28 am
Hey Giulio, thanks for the correction, you’re right. In my experience, both Tonal Editing and true HDR both require the same process of precise adjustment to look right.
speak up
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed
You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>